<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: World&#8217;s Smallest, Lightest Telemedicine Microscope	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://tissuepathology.com/2010/04/26/worlds-smallest-lightest-telemedicine-microscope/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://tissuepathology.com/2010/04/26/worlds-smallest-lightest-telemedicine-microscope/</link>
	<description>Educational and informative</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2015 19:29:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Dane		</title>
		<link>https://tissuepathology.com/2010/04/26/worlds-smallest-lightest-telemedicine-microscope/#comment-239</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dane]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jun 2010 05:38:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tissuepathology.org/posts/pathology-news/worlds-smallest-lightest-telemedicine-microscope/#comment-239</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I must say I&#039;m quite impartial on telemedicine. Whilst standards of technology can be a hinderance on communication (most webcams and sounds devices associated with telemedicine are often thought not to be sophisticated enough for dealing with important dermatological and other health issues), they are certainly improving in parallel with advances in resolution display.
High definition telemedicine is already becoming popular amongst those who are unable to personally interact with their doctor/physician/dermatologist, perhaps because it gives a much clearer and detailed view of the patient making it much easier to appear that they and the doctor are in the same room.
However, the disadvantages remain and as it is early days, high definition telemedicine may not be affordable for everyone just yet.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I must say I&#8217;m quite impartial on telemedicine. Whilst standards of technology can be a hinderance on communication (most webcams and sounds devices associated with telemedicine are often thought not to be sophisticated enough for dealing with important dermatological and other health issues), they are certainly improving in parallel with advances in resolution display.<br />
High definition telemedicine is already becoming popular amongst those who are unable to personally interact with their doctor/physician/dermatologist, perhaps because it gives a much clearer and detailed view of the patient making it much easier to appear that they and the doctor are in the same room.<br />
However, the disadvantages remain and as it is early days, high definition telemedicine may not be affordable for everyone just yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
