<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Simple answer to Send My Slides Back Now!	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://tissuepathology.com/2010/12/20/simple-answer-to-send-my-slides-back-now/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://tissuepathology.com/2010/12/20/simple-answer-to-send-my-slides-back-now/</link>
	<description>Educational and informative</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2015 20:15:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Ole Eichhorn		</title>
		<link>https://tissuepathology.com/2010/12/20/simple-answer-to-send-my-slides-back-now/#comment-163</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ole Eichhorn]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Dec 2010 08:44:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tissuepathology.org/posts/pathology-news/simple-answer-to-send-my-slides-back-now/#comment-163</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Digital Pathology is indeed the answer.  In fact there are three distinct value propositions for digital pathology in secondary consults:
1) Archival of slides by sending institution.  When slides are sent as glass, sometimes they are not returned.  Archiving slides before they are sent gives the referrer a permanent, easily retrieved record of the case.
2) Archival of slides by receiving institution.  When slides are received as glass they are usually returned.  Archiving slides received for a consult gives the consultant a permanent, easily retrieved record of the case.
3) [as noted] sending slides digitally.  This has several advantages; in addition to given both referrer and consultant a permanent, easily retrieved record of the case, it improves turnaround time and saves shipping and handling costs.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Digital Pathology is indeed the answer.  In fact there are three distinct value propositions for digital pathology in secondary consults:<br />
1) Archival of slides by sending institution.  When slides are sent as glass, sometimes they are not returned.  Archiving slides before they are sent gives the referrer a permanent, easily retrieved record of the case.<br />
2) Archival of slides by receiving institution.  When slides are received as glass they are usually returned.  Archiving slides received for a consult gives the consultant a permanent, easily retrieved record of the case.<br />
3) [as noted] sending slides digitally.  This has several advantages; in addition to given both referrer and consultant a permanent, easily retrieved record of the case, it improves turnaround time and saves shipping and handling costs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
