<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: The Future of Anatomic Pathology &#8211; 2 Possible Outcomes and More	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://tissuepathology.com/2017/01/31/the-future-of-anatomic-pathology-2-possible-outcomes-and-more/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://tissuepathology.com/2017/01/31/the-future-of-anatomic-pathology-2-possible-outcomes-and-more/</link>
	<description>Educational and informative</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2017 20:46:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Dr. Keith J. Kaplan		</title>
		<link>https://tissuepathology.com/2017/01/31/the-future-of-anatomic-pathology-2-possible-outcomes-and-more/#comment-153174</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dr. Keith J. Kaplan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2017 20:46:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tissuepathology.com/?p=11413#comment-153174</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://tissuepathology.com/2017/01/31/the-future-of-anatomic-pathology-2-possible-outcomes-and-more/#comment-153156&quot;&gt;JT Kim&lt;/a&gt;.

It has been some time since I have been affiliated with a residency program full-time but I am not entirely convinced training programs are adapt at preparing residents for many roles and responsibilities, including, but not limited to, evaluating &quot;emerging technologies&quot; and validating them for clinical use, negotiating with vendors, and advocating for what belongs in the pathology and the information derived from it, i.e. liquid biopsy, genomics AND narrowing the gap between pathology and pharma when it comes to companion diagnostics and treatments.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://tissuepathology.com/2017/01/31/the-future-of-anatomic-pathology-2-possible-outcomes-and-more/#comment-153156">JT Kim</a>.</p>
<p>It has been some time since I have been affiliated with a residency program full-time but I am not entirely convinced training programs are adapt at preparing residents for many roles and responsibilities, including, but not limited to, evaluating &#8220;emerging technologies&#8221; and validating them for clinical use, negotiating with vendors, and advocating for what belongs in the pathology and the information derived from it, i.e. liquid biopsy, genomics AND narrowing the gap between pathology and pharma when it comes to companion diagnostics and treatments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: JT Kim		</title>
		<link>https://tissuepathology.com/2017/01/31/the-future-of-anatomic-pathology-2-possible-outcomes-and-more/#comment-153156</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JT Kim]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2017 04:52:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tissuepathology.com/?p=11413#comment-153156</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hi Dr. Kaplan. Very surreal outlook for surgical pathology that will be reality in the coming years. Should the pathology residency start changing how we train our residents?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Dr. Kaplan. Very surreal outlook for surgical pathology that will be reality in the coming years. Should the pathology residency start changing how we train our residents?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
